Redshirt
Analysis

Make-the-Playoff Markets: Ohio State Screens Cheap

Make-the-playoff value reads off the title board, and Ohio State at 5c is the only contender trading below the model's 5.1% fair value right now.

By The Model Desk · 2026-11-02
Analysis
vsvsvs
Key takeaways
  • Ohio State is the only title contender trading below model fair value: 5c on Kalshi against a 5.1% fair mark.
  • Indiana (8c vs 7.8% fair) and Alabama (5c vs 4.9% fair) carry the next-tightest premiums on the board.
  • Georgia posts the steepest premium among favorites: 22c against a 19.9% fair value, a 2.1-point markup.
  • Ole Miss shows the widest longshot markup, 5c against a 3.3% fair value.
  • Kalshi holds the best price on Ohio State, Alabama and Ole Miss; Polymarket leads on Miami, Notre Dame, LSU and Texas.

Make-the-playoff value reads off the national title board, and on that screen Ohio State is the only contender trading below the model's fair value: 5c on Kalshi against a 5.1% fair mark. Indiana (8c versus 7.8%) and Alabama (5c versus 4.9%) sit effectively flat to fair, the tightest premiums on the board. The favorites, by contrast, carry the fattest markups.

How do make-the-playoff markets price contenders?

There is no standalone make-the-playoff contract in the current data; a team's playoff path is embedded in its national title equity, so the title board serves as the proxy. A contender that cannot reach the bracket cannot win the title, and the price of title equity moves with the perceived odds of getting there.

The model builds de-vigged fair value by stripping the overround out of title prices across Polymarket and Kalshi. Comparing the best available price to that fair value shows the premium a buyer pays at entry. When price sits at or under fair value, the contract screens underpriced on the model's read.

Which contenders are underpriced right now?

Ohio State is the single contract trading under fair value: 5c on Kalshi against a 5.1% fair mark. The gap is small, but it is the only negative premium on the board, which puts the cost of entry marginally below the model's estimate.

Indiana and Alabama round out the tight tier. Indiana's 8c sits just over a 7.8% fair value, and Alabama's 5c barely clears a 4.9% mark. Both read as near-flat, meaning the market and the model are close to agreement rather than offering a clear edge.

These are reads, not guarantees. The best price and the fair value are both estimates, and either can be off; a compressed premium only indicates where the entry cost tracks the model.

Cheapest entry among contenders
Ohio State5c
Alabama5c
Ole Miss5c
Texas7c
Indiana8c
LSU9c

Where is the premium steepest?

The markup widens at the top of the board. Georgia leads the field at 22c against a 19.9% fair value, a 2.1-point premium, and Miami follows at 16c versus 14.1%, a 1.9-point gap. Buyers of the favorites are paying the most over the model's number.

The pattern is not confined to favorites. Ole Miss, a longshot at 5c, carries a 1.7-point premium over a 3.3% fair value, the widest markup relative to its own price on the board. Notre Dame (14c vs 12.7%) and LSU (9c vs 7.9%) sit in the middle of the premium range.

National title fair value, playoff tier
Georgia19.9%
Miami14.1%
Notre Dame12.7%
LSU7.9%
Indiana7.8%
Texas6.4%
Ohio State5.1%
Alabama4.9%

Where is the cheapest venue to trade these contracts?

Venue matters, because the best price decides the premium paid. Kalshi holds the cheapest entry on Ohio State (5c), Alabama (5c) and Ole Miss (5c), and also posts the top Georgia price at 22c. Kalshi's new-account code FADE applies for traders opening there.

Polymarket leads on the rest of the contender tier: Miami at 16c, Notre Dame at 14c, LSU at 9c, Indiana at 8c and Texas at 7c. Polymarket's code TGSWC covers that side. Pricing the same contract at both venues before entry is what keeps the premium honest.

What would move these prices?

Results are the primary driver. A contender's title equity, and with it its implied playoff standing, reprices on wins, losses and the strength of the path still ahead. Liquidity and fresh news fill in the rest, which is why the cheapest venue can shift week to week.

For now the screen is narrow: Ohio State alone trades under fair value, with Indiana and Alabama flat behind it, while Georgia, Miami and Ole Miss carry the premium the rest of the board is paying.

TeamsOhio StIndianaAlabamaMiamiGeorgiaOle Miss
Advertisement
Polymarket ad

Frequently asked questions

Which playoff contender is underpriced right now?

Ohio State is the lone contender trading below model fair value, at 5c on Kalshi against a 5.1% fair mark. Indiana and Alabama sit effectively flat to fair.

Is there a dedicated make-the-playoff market?

The analysis reads make-the-playoff value off the national title board, since a team's playoff path is embedded in its title equity. The model de-vigs title prices across Polymarket and Kalshi to set fair value.

Which contender carries the biggest price premium over fair value?

Georgia, at 22c against a 19.9% fair value, a 2.1-point markup. Miami (16c vs 14.1%) and Ole Miss (5c vs 3.3%) follow.

Where is the cheapest venue to trade these contracts?

Kalshi holds the best price on Ohio State, Alabama and Ole Miss at 5c each. Polymarket leads on Miami, Notre Dame, LSU, Texas and Indiana.

Does a low price mean a contract is a sure thing?

No. The best price and the model's fair value are estimates, and both can be wrong. A tight premium only means the cost of entry sits close to the model's read.

About the author
The Model Desk

The Redshirt Analytics modeling team prices every college football futures contract and tracks the gaps between fair value and live market prices on Kalshi, Polymarket and ProphetX.