Redshirt
Analysis

Make-the-Playoff Markets: Underpriced Contenders

Make-the-playoff value in CFB markets clusters around Ohio State and Indiana at 6.8% title fair value, with Georgia and LSU the mid-board names to track.

By The Model Desk · 2026-07-05
Analysis
vsvsvs
Key takeaways
  • Ohio State and Indiana both carry a 6.8% national-title fair value, the top of the second tier and the clearest make-the-playoff signal on the board.
  • Georgia sits at 5.2% fair value with a best price of 7c on Kalshi, the priciest of the mid-board contenders.
  • LSU prices at 4.4% fair value and 6c on Kalshi, bridging the favorites and the longshots.
  • Texas A&M at 2.8% fair value (4c) leads a cluster of SEC and Big 12 names the title market rates as marginal.
  • The current board is Kalshi-only, so every fair value is de-vigged from a single venue rather than a multi-exchange consensus.

The contenders the title board underprices as playoff entrants sit just below the favorites: Ohio State and Indiana, both at 6.8% national-title fair value, then Georgia at 5.2% and LSU at 4.4%. These are the teams the market rates as live enough to threaten a title, which by definition prices them to reach the field, yet cheap enough that a make-the-playoff read finds room. The figures below are national-title fair values on a Kalshi-only board, used here as a proxy for playoff-berth probability rather than direct make-the-playoff contracts.

Why title fair value stands in for make-the-playoff odds

A dedicated make-the-playoff contract is not on the current board, so the cleanest available signal is the de-vigged title price. The logic holds because reaching the 12-team field is a precondition for winning it: any probability the market assigns to a title runs entirely through the playoff. A team priced at a 6.8% title fair value is being credited with a substantial berth probability that the title number only partially reveals.

That relationship compresses at the top and stretches at the bottom. Miami's 9.2% title fair value and the 8.4% cluster of Texas, Oregon and Notre Dame carry berth probabilities close to a coin flip or better, so there is little markdown to exploit. The value question lives one rung down, where title odds fall faster than berth odds do.

Ohio State and Indiana lead the second tier at 6.8%

Ohio State and Indiana are the pivot point. Both price at 6.8% title fair value and 9c on Kalshi, a step below the 8.4% trio and a clear step above Georgia. For a make-the-playoff read, that is the sweet spot: strong enough that a berth is the base case, priced low enough that the title haircut understates the berth probability.

The identical pricing on two structurally different Big Ten programs is itself the tell. The market has bucketed them together at 9c, which is efficient shorthand but leaves no separation for the team with the softer path to the field. That is where a berth-specific view would diverge from the shared title line.

Georgia and LSU anchor the mid-board

Georgia at 5.2% fair value (7c on Kalshi) and LSU at 4.4% (6c) form the next band. Both are SEC programs with the resume history to survive a two-loss season and still reach a 12-team field, a scenario the title price barely accounts for. The 7c and 6c contracts are where the gap between title odds and berth odds is widest.

Below them sits the longshot cluster: Texas A&M at 2.8% (4c), then Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Ole Miss all at 2% (3c). These are priced as title afterthoughts, but the SEC and Big 12 names among them retain a live path to the field. The model does not force a call here; it flags that title pricing this low can undercount berth equity for teams in deep conferences.

Reading the board and its single-venue caveat

The prices in this analysis come from Kalshi alone, so each fair value is de-vigged from one venue rather than blended across Kalshi, Polymarket and ProphetX. A single-source consensus is thinner than a multi-exchange one and more exposed to that book's specific margin, so the fair values should be read as directional rather than settled. Kalshi promo FADE applies for those comparing venues.

The takeaway is narrow and grounded: on the current board, the second tier from Ohio State and Indiana at 6.8% down through LSU at 4.4% is where title pricing most plausibly lags playoff-berth probability. Prices and the model can both be wrong, and none of this is financial advice; it is a read on where the numbers and the structure of a 12-team field disagree.

The mid-board at a glance

The chart below shows title fair value for the second-tier contenders, the band where the make-the-playoff read is most active.

Title fair value: second-tier CFP contenders
Ohio State6.8%
Indiana6.8%
Georgia5.2%
LSU4.4%
Texas A&M2.8%
Oklahoma2%
TeamsOhio StIndianaGeorgiaLSUTexas A&MOklahoma
Advertisement
Polymarket ad

Frequently asked questions

Which CFB teams look underpriced to make the playoff?

Ohio State and Indiana, both at 6.8% title fair value, top the second tier and read as the strongest make-the-playoff value. Georgia (5.2%) and LSU (4.4%) follow as mid-board names.

Do these odds cover making the playoff or winning the title?

The listed figures are national-title fair values, not direct make-the-playoff contracts. Title pricing serves as a proxy: teams the market rates as live title threats are, by definition, priced to reach the field.

Where are the best prices for these contenders?

Every contract on the current board shows its best price on Kalshi. Georgia is 7c, LSU 6c, Texas A&M 4c, and the Ohio State and Indiana pair sits at 9c.

Why do Ohio State and Indiana share the same odds?

Both carry a 6.8% title fair value and a 9c best price on Kalshi. The market currently treats the two Big Ten programs as interchangeable at the top of the second tier.

How is fair value different from the best price?

Fair value is the de-vigged probability after stripping the market's margin, while the best price is the cheapest contract cost in cents. Ohio State's 6.8% fair value against a 9c price shows the built-in vig.

About the author
The Model Desk

The Redshirt Analytics modeling team prices every college football futures contract and tracks the gaps between fair value and live market prices on Kalshi, Polymarket and ProphetX.